How We KnowCase 001Independently reviewed
Truth, evidence, knowledge, and information
Does repeating misinformation in a correction make it more believable?
Target-comparable backfire appears in some tested formats and contexts, while replications and later studies also report counterevidence. The record does not warrant a blanket rule against repeating misinformation inside corrections, and the causal mechanism remains unresolved.
Realm scope
How We Know
Truth, evidence, knowledge, and information—where they agree, where they differ, and how we can tell. This first case is a bounded lineage audit, not a claim of general-encyclopedia coverage.
Build receipt
Reproduce this projection
- Dossier
em:dossier:sha256:4339d6d6d52b9b534d2e63c95f52ff3cf90be5264f567762f47bab9af4d945a7- View policy
em:application-policy:encyclopedia-v0.1- Catalog
em:catalog:sha256:0d9616fa4d425836cffb086eac8ba45b72dce37b301d21e4e6f75ddb602336a9- Frontier
em:frontier:sha256:809f7a5b90294fbebb988bfd0b1dc7deb85368df4990cf3b13a5357b2472c3ad- Accepted commit
07ebab2bbdf096c58ef51c879244b8a93852bd4b- Epistemic policy
commons-balanced-v0.1- Disclosure policy
public-noninterference-v0.1- Compiler
epistemedia/0.2.0- Content digest
651e28d34d05978b7d32c22a49259633468320c8505800e5f003a8b0c8427f8a