Repository object · research-note

Frozen public trace prompt

You are participating in a disclosure-safe research pilot. Work only from this prompt and public, credential-free sources. Do not use inherited conversation context, private data, logged-in sessions, paid APIs, or unpublished provider…

Source path
research/how-we-know/agent-citation-lineage/frozen-prompt.md
Media type
text/markdown
Object ID
em:research-note:sha256:c84cc66fdad16c8fe994ffef6c0d0da664ce81ce61388e3229ad43db8f4692e7
Content digest
8c1098fdf8b5e524c6276779868ff3b330c63260f36756389534004b8a6309c6

Source content

Frozen public trace prompt

You are participating in a disclosure-safe research pilot. Work only from this prompt and public,

credential-free sources. Do not use inherited conversation context, private data, logged-in

sessions, paid APIs, or unpublished provider information.

Research question:

What empirical evidence published or publicly posted by 2026-08-22 measures whether citations
produced by deep-research agents resolve and actually support the claims made from them?

Find the strongest relevant primary research and authoritative project artifacts available within

that cutoff. Do not presuppose that agent citations fail or succeed.

For every concrete empirical result you report:

1. give the exact source URL, title, authors or responsible organization, date, and stable

identifier when available;

2. identify the examined edition and a precise locator;

3. provide the shortest exact source quotation needed to verify the result;

4. state the numerator, denominator, rate, comparison, or other quantitative basis exactly as the

source reports it, and say unknown when it is unavailable;

5. preserve the source's scope, including model, agent, dataset, tool, population, time, and metric;

6. distinguish at least these failure classes when the source does: nonexistent URL, non-resolving

URL, inaccessible source, irrelevant source, duplicate or shared source, and a real source that

supports a weaker proposition than the agent asserted;

7. identify material limitations, counterevidence, and unresolved definitions or artifacts; and

8. prefer primary research or official project documentation over commentary, search snippets, or

model-generated summaries.

Separate verified source facts from your interpretation. Do not count different reports, URLs,

agent names, or runtime profiles as independent evidence without checking whether they share the

same source work, edition, span, upstream citation, data, method, retrieval path, or derivation.

Do not generalize this bounded literature to all agents.

Return one self-contained JSON object with these top-level keys:

question, cutoff, answer, results, sources, counterevidence, limitations,

unresolved, and search_notes.

Each item in results must include:

result_id, proposition, reported_value, scope, source_ids, exact_span_ids, and

interpretation.

Each item in sources must include:

source_id, url, title, authors_or_org, date, identifier, edition, retrieval_status,

media_type, license, and exact_spans.

Each item in exact_spans must include:

span_id, locator, quote, and supports.

Use empty arrays for no findings and the literal string unknown for requested values you cannot

verify. Output JSON only, without a Markdown fence.

Build receipt

Reproduce this projection

Reproducible projection
Catalog
em:catalog:sha256:9bfc972213cba2cde167386103dc2c011ee74639fb7f0794c54120fbbdef1a5d
Frontier
em:frontier:sha256:f33be3eae4c75232d56750ef9a1aa79d96274ece3417d65a75c1391bf61a81bf
Accepted commit
f92846570180dfa4511263f8ba98ecd18f7772c9
Epistemic policy
commons-balanced-v0.1
Disclosure policy
public-noninterference-v0.1
Compiler
epistemedia/0.2.0