Repository object · documentation
Preliminary readiness for the next How We Know cases
Status: accepted source-readiness synthesis. Exact-head reviewed and admitted through protected PR #50 at cbb029bd336404e5bc654e939308247317eaa153; none of these three candidates was admitted as a dossier or public case by EM-0027.
- Media type
text/markdown- Object ID
em:documentation:sha256:ec6ff7dcb3b14a1459ff1d001e964abf516cb4e8e905d6f43324e11c911aa6d6- Content digest
d8fa724d9e76b1da937463180a6714ba48de2229ca40e56108570cefe3d5907e
Source content
Preliminary readiness for the next How We Know cases
Status: accepted source-readiness synthesis. Exact-head reviewed and admitted through protected
PR #50 at cbb029bd336404e5bc654e939308247317eaa153; none of these three candidates was admitted as
a dossier or public case by EM-0027.
Three candidate directions were checked independently against primary or authoritative source
identity, access, licensing, proposition scope, likely lineage, active dispute, and review cost.
They remain separate research packets; their sources and provisional dispositions must not be
combined into one evidence count.
The source-readiness result is HOLD for all three candidates, for different reasons:
- GPT-4 bar-exam percentile: the model report, score study, re-analysis, and comparison
- Mehrabian 7–38–55: the two 1967 work identities, narrow attitude-inference experiments,
- Fact-check effectiveness: the four-country experiment and public replication deposit are
sources are identifiable, but the at-launch percentile chart, interpolation, and comparison
population are not closed.
later author qualification, and cross-study proposal are traceable, but lawful stable primary
access, the origin of the 7% coefficient, and book/material edition closure remain open.
identifiable, but the corrected meta-analysis lineage, reply/reanalysis artifacts,
behavior-versus-belief boundary, and overlap with Case 001 must be closed before a case can be
scoped honestly.
Each later research contract must therefore record:
1. whether the original and corrective source editions can be retrieved without credentials;
2. what proposition each source actually reports versus the proposition in circulation;
3. which papers reuse the same data, derivation, author program, or comparison frame;
4. which source, license, edition, or counterevidence gaps still block a dossier; and
5. a fresh go, hold, or fail based on source closure and machinery value rather than
perceived importance.
These are retrieval and review gates, not findings about whether the circulated claims are true.
No candidate has been selected, admitted, featured, or published by this mapping.
Detailed source ledgers live under
research/how-we-know/library-preliminary/.
The accepted packet bytes and all three HOLD dispositions remain unchanged. EM-0032 and
EM-0033 now authorize separate closure research for the GPT-4 and Mehrabian candidates.
Build receipt
Reproduce this projection
- Catalog
em:catalog:sha256:9bfc972213cba2cde167386103dc2c011ee74639fb7f0794c54120fbbdef1a5d- Frontier
em:frontier:sha256:f33be3eae4c75232d56750ef9a1aa79d96274ece3417d65a75c1391bf61a81bf- Accepted commit
f92846570180dfa4511263f8ba98ecd18f7772c9- Epistemic policy
commons-balanced-v0.1- Disclosure policy
public-noninterference-v0.1- Compiler
epistemedia/0.2.0