Repository object · documentation
EM-0021 execution plan
Status: candidate validation complete; awaiting exact-head independent review on codex/em-0021-feature-backfire-case.
- Source path
docs/execution-plans/EM-0021.md- Media type
text/markdown- Object ID
em:documentation:sha256:c9c7451d1b3ec0efe452ddbf264b384327f76111c305b3c7d227ad080cf05f35- Content digest
252aabd54aa1bc751eb538cc44a1907270757ec620ba1bc7ed48e25b7d6ec3eb
Source content
EM-0021 execution plan
Status: candidate validation complete; awaiting exact-head independent review on
codex/em-0021-feature-backfire-case.
Objective
Compile the independently reviewed familiarity-backfire dossier into the first public **How We
Know** experience without copying or weakening its evidence model, while ensuring every compiled
current-state document accurately distinguishes the application-level dossier pilot from the
self-describing repository corpus and the still-unimplemented normative replay architecture. The
accepted feature manifest is the editorial-selection input; the reviewed dossier and receipt
remain the evidence authority.
Succession record
EM-0021 supersedes EM-0020 because independent review of the exact EM-0020 candidate at
07713131e57b662230acffe4fd48f56fa3d91502 found two stale README descriptions in the compiled
public corpus. EM-0020 did not authorize README.md; the earlier EM-0016 maintenance task had
already been completed. The owner merged the narrow EM-0021 authority registration in PR #35 at
998f5dfed308e36f8f83ba166f3c680c582af128. No EM-0020 implementation commit was merged.
Change surface
1. Add a strict application-level feature loader that binds the selection manifest to the exact
dossier bytes, dossier identity, independent pass receipt, reviewed Git head, claim family,
policy evaluations, relations, spans, editions, and source works.
2. Derive raw assertion and participant-data-lineage counts from modeled relations rather than
storing display totals.
3. Compile the same disclosure-safe policy projection into human HTML, Markdown, JSON, API, MCP,
and CLI adapters with one envelope identity and content digest per view.
4. Replace the project-self homepage lead with the accepted external finding, while retaining the
self-describing repository corpus under Explore and Documentation.
5. Correct README and launch-facing current-state prose without claiming that the dossier is the
normative event graph or that an unverified hosted interface is live.
6. Test source-span closure, real shared-ancestor collapse, policy divergence, interface parity,
current-state copy, no-JavaScript and keyboard structure, disclosure noninterference, and
deterministic rebuilds.
7. Inspect desktop and mobile rendering, record a run receipt, obtain exact-head independent
review, merge through the protected owner-gated path, deploy Pages, and verify canonical routes
and content types.
Hard boundaries
- No changes to
constitution/,policies/,schemas/,governance/events/, - The application views do not become protocol semantics or universal truth policies.
- Hosted API and MCP endpoints remain described as reserved until separately deployed and read
- Correct source and layout behavior establish implementation behavior, not human comprehension.
- Merge, publication, deployment, DNS, credentials, and spend remain explicit owner gates.
.github/, tasks/contracts/, or the reviewed research packet.
back; static and local adapters must not be described as hosted production runtimes.
Candidate verification
- strict feature-manifest binding to the exact independently reviewed dossier and receipt bytes,
- deterministic relation-derived counts plus a real shared-ancestor adversarial check;
- exact HTML, Markdown, JSON, local REST, MCP resource/tool, and CLI envelope parity;
- encyclopedia/skeptical source-object parity with materially different evaluations and selected
- README and launch-document assertions that preserve the application/normative/deployment
- fail-closed byte-drift mutation test and public disclosure audit;
- no-script semantic HTML, one
h1, named navigation regions, native disclosure controls, visible - browser inspection at
1440 x 900and390 x 844, including homepage, both policy views, and .venv/bin/ruff check src/epistemedia/featured.py tests/test_featured.py;.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_featured.py tests/test_interfaces.py -q— 37 testsmake check PYTHON=.venv/bin/python— 71 tests passed, disclosure audit returned no findings,- immutable local receipt
em0021-local-20260822T2042Zrecords the full check command.
dossier ID, receipt format and independence attestations, reviewed head, claim family,
evaluations, relations, spans, editions, and source works;
relations;
boundaries and reject the superseded current-state wording;
skip-link focus, and no horizontal overflow;
an expanded exact-source x-ray;
passed;
deterministic comparison build verified, and source state remained unchanged;
External route, canonical URL, content-type, keyboard, and provider-manifest read-back remain
post-merge Pages acceptance checks; no hosted API/MCP runtime is asserted.
Build receipt
Reproduce this projection
- Catalog
em:catalog:sha256:9bfc972213cba2cde167386103dc2c011ee74639fb7f0794c54120fbbdef1a5d- Frontier
em:frontier:sha256:f33be3eae4c75232d56750ef9a1aa79d96274ece3417d65a75c1391bf61a81bf- Accepted commit
f92846570180dfa4511263f8ba98ecd18f7772c9- Epistemic policy
commons-balanced-v0.1- Disclosure policy
public-noninterference-v0.1- Compiler
epistemedia/0.2.0