Repository object · documentation

EM-0021 execution plan

Status: candidate validation complete; awaiting exact-head independent review on codex/em-0021-feature-backfire-case.

Source path
docs/execution-plans/EM-0021.md
Media type
text/markdown
Object ID
em:documentation:sha256:c9c7451d1b3ec0efe452ddbf264b384327f76111c305b3c7d227ad080cf05f35
Content digest
252aabd54aa1bc751eb538cc44a1907270757ec620ba1bc7ed48e25b7d6ec3eb

Source content

EM-0021 execution plan

Status: candidate validation complete; awaiting exact-head independent review on

codex/em-0021-feature-backfire-case.

Objective

Compile the independently reviewed familiarity-backfire dossier into the first public **How We

Know** experience without copying or weakening its evidence model, while ensuring every compiled

current-state document accurately distinguishes the application-level dossier pilot from the

self-describing repository corpus and the still-unimplemented normative replay architecture. The

accepted feature manifest is the editorial-selection input; the reviewed dossier and receipt

remain the evidence authority.

Succession record

EM-0021 supersedes EM-0020 because independent review of the exact EM-0020 candidate at

07713131e57b662230acffe4fd48f56fa3d91502 found two stale README descriptions in the compiled

public corpus. EM-0020 did not authorize README.md; the earlier EM-0016 maintenance task had

already been completed. The owner merged the narrow EM-0021 authority registration in PR #35 at

998f5dfed308e36f8f83ba166f3c680c582af128. No EM-0020 implementation commit was merged.

Change surface

1. Add a strict application-level feature loader that binds the selection manifest to the exact

dossier bytes, dossier identity, independent pass receipt, reviewed Git head, claim family,

policy evaluations, relations, spans, editions, and source works.

2. Derive raw assertion and participant-data-lineage counts from modeled relations rather than

storing display totals.

3. Compile the same disclosure-safe policy projection into human HTML, Markdown, JSON, API, MCP,

and CLI adapters with one envelope identity and content digest per view.

4. Replace the project-self homepage lead with the accepted external finding, while retaining the

self-describing repository corpus under Explore and Documentation.

5. Correct README and launch-facing current-state prose without claiming that the dossier is the

normative event graph or that an unverified hosted interface is live.

6. Test source-span closure, real shared-ancestor collapse, policy divergence, interface parity,

current-state copy, no-JavaScript and keyboard structure, disclosure noninterference, and

deterministic rebuilds.

7. Inspect desktop and mobile rendering, record a run receipt, obtain exact-head independent

review, merge through the protected owner-gated path, deploy Pages, and verify canonical routes

and content types.

Hard boundaries

  • No changes to constitution/, policies/, schemas/, governance/events/,
  • .github/, tasks/contracts/, or the reviewed research packet.

  • The application views do not become protocol semantics or universal truth policies.
  • Hosted API and MCP endpoints remain described as reserved until separately deployed and read
  • back; static and local adapters must not be described as hosted production runtimes.

  • Correct source and layout behavior establish implementation behavior, not human comprehension.
  • Merge, publication, deployment, DNS, credentials, and spend remain explicit owner gates.

Candidate verification

  • strict feature-manifest binding to the exact independently reviewed dossier and receipt bytes,
  • dossier ID, receipt format and independence attestations, reviewed head, claim family,

    evaluations, relations, spans, editions, and source works;

  • deterministic relation-derived counts plus a real shared-ancestor adversarial check;
  • exact HTML, Markdown, JSON, local REST, MCP resource/tool, and CLI envelope parity;
  • encyclopedia/skeptical source-object parity with materially different evaluations and selected
  • relations;

  • README and launch-document assertions that preserve the application/normative/deployment
  • boundaries and reject the superseded current-state wording;

  • fail-closed byte-drift mutation test and public disclosure audit;
  • no-script semantic HTML, one h1, named navigation regions, native disclosure controls, visible
  • skip-link focus, and no horizontal overflow;

  • browser inspection at 1440 x 900 and 390 x 844, including homepage, both policy views, and
  • an expanded exact-source x-ray;

  • .venv/bin/ruff check src/epistemedia/featured.py tests/test_featured.py;
  • .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/test_featured.py tests/test_interfaces.py -q — 37 tests
  • passed;

  • make check PYTHON=.venv/bin/python — 71 tests passed, disclosure audit returned no findings,
  • deterministic comparison build verified, and source state remained unchanged;

  • immutable local receipt em0021-local-20260822T2042Z records the full check command.

External route, canonical URL, content-type, keyboard, and provider-manifest read-back remain

post-merge Pages acceptance checks; no hosted API/MCP runtime is asserted.

Build receipt

Reproduce this projection

Reproducible projection
Catalog
em:catalog:sha256:9bfc972213cba2cde167386103dc2c011ee74639fb7f0794c54120fbbdef1a5d
Frontier
em:frontier:sha256:f33be3eae4c75232d56750ef9a1aa79d96274ece3417d65a75c1391bf61a81bf
Accepted commit
f92846570180dfa4511263f8ba98ecd18f7772c9
Epistemic policy
commons-balanced-v0.1
Disclosure policy
public-noninterference-v0.1
Compiler
epistemedia/0.2.0