EM-0035 execution plan

Source content

EM-0035 execution plan

Status: author candidate complete; fresh-clone independent dossier review pending.

Objective

Project the exact independently reviewed EM-0033 Mehrabian packet into one

disclosure-safe, reversible Case 004 candidate dossier without admitting,

featuring, publishing, or deploying it.

Authority and identity

• immutable task: tasks/contracts/EM-0035.json;
• accepted starting base: a620f658e89ed527bc3a3a3b6d125d19c8d1c468;
• branch: codex/em-0035-case004-dossier;
• accepted packet ID:

em:research-packet:sha256:a73dc29f0a0c3f05a112b7c392d115cfcc38a1136a683325bf74bebf0c6b2e40;

• accepted packet SHA-256:

6253a8ece3bb3b5bfb393ec04ad4e0f14b88f567ddea2923300538eadb7c8cde;

• accepted independent-review SHA-256:

b70e6ae4f073004cc602860bf0a1c3976d6c7fb12c3440253e68a8ff20538d1b;

• accepted source-register SHA-256:

0ac4f87236882d32aa6018e50600a79642b87acdf05e27c291514e770fda081c.

Every accepted EM-0033 research, plan, note, and run-receipt byte is pinned by

the candidate verifier.

The builder reads only the accepted packet, source register, and independent

receipt; it performs no retrieval.

Candidate construction

1. Preserve 11 source-work identities, 12 edition identities, and all 40

reviewed parent-span objects with retrieval and license treatments.

2. Keep the P1 words-and-tone participant root and P2 face-and-tone participant

root distinct.

3. Represent the .07/.38/.55 statement as P2's later cross-study proposal,

never as one three-channel experiment.

4. Reproduce all six accepted calculations mechanically, while keeping the

exact source derivation of .07 unknown and no-credit.

5. Preserve the 1971 author boundary and the unknown, uncollated 1981

formula-page continuity as separate edition-lineage objects.

6. Keep Hegstrom's direct all-channel rebuttal, the two Argyle participant

roots, Lapakko critique/propagation, institutional recirculation, and bounded

follow-up search separate.

7. Project all 11 accepted participant, speaker, author-social, grant,

stimulus, material, method, scale, citation, book-edition, and derivation

edges into exact evidence-linked dependence relations.

8. Close each material proposition to one assertion, exact reviewed spans,

calculation lineage where applicable, and explicit evidence relations.

9. Apply encyclopedia and skeptical policies to one unchanged source graph

with materially different labels, reasons, thresholds, and reader upshots.

Deterministic dossier

• dossier ID:

em:dossier:sha256:57e80c9a44c478c1c81ba7adedc1bafdef43ff57b4f2984015dcbef84ba66e87;

• candidate file SHA-256:

44e7bf407091d7665d4f1ab2aabc285255364e790e2d17520913f9ba9c57b418;

• 11 source works, 12 editions, and 40 exact parent spans;
• 20 propositions, 23 lineages, 20 assertions, and 35 evidence relations;
• one claim family and two materially distinct policy evaluations;
• five participant-data roots, six accepted lineage groups, and 11 accepted

typed dependence edges;

• three propagation objects with zero scientific-rule credit and five bounded

follow-up dispositions.

The exact sentence/source/calculation/lineage closure is summarized in

DOSSIER.md and

machine-enforced in the builder and verifier.

Validation gates

• deterministic rebuild and exact dossier content-address recomputation;
• byte-for-byte preservation of every accepted EM-0033 artifact and receipt;
• strict dossier-format, reference, span, public-disclosure, and policy-frontier

validation;

• exact source/work/edition/span/claim/calculation/lineage/propagation/follow-up

identity sets and relation-derived counts;

• complete material-sentence assertion, parent-span, calculation, and relation

closure;

• five distinct participant-data roots and 11 evidence-linked typed dependence

relations;

• explicit unknown/no-credit treatment for the .07 origin and 1981 edition

formula pages;

• materially distinct encyclopedia and skeptical evaluations over one source

graph;

• fail-closed independent receipt binding exact base/head/tree, reviewer

non-authorship, timestamps, command-output digests, clean pre/post state,

complete per-object results, limitations, findings, and decision;

• adversarial candidate and receipt tests, Ruff, git diff --check, full

make check, deterministic rebuild, and clean tracked state.

Author validation record

• build_candidate.py --check reproduced the committed candidate and content

address;

• verify_candidate.py --self-test verified exact closure and rejected 20

forged or incomplete review receipts;

• six adversarial candidate/receipt pytest cases passed;
• verify_candidate.py --require-review fails closed until the independent

EM-0035 receipt is appended;

• Ruff, git diff --check, and full make check passed;
• append-only author validation receipt:

runs/proposals/20260827T214606Z-92fd185392eb.json;

• exact author head/tree, draft PR, and CI identities are recorded after push.

Boundaries

The output remains a research candidate. No independent-review authorship,

catalog admission, feature selection, production-availability claim,

publication, deployment, DNS, provider, credential, package, release, or spend

action is authorized by this plan.