How We Know · Separate process audit

Review receipt for Case 001

A separate Codex review agent worked from a fresh clone, independently retrieved the declared evidence, and did not use the authoring agent's artifacts. It checked the bounded evidence and build scope below; it did not decide whether the scientific conclusion is ultimately true.

← Return to the evidence docket

Decision

Pass

Technical reviewer ID codex-independent-reviewer completed the process audit on .

Exact-head pass
Reviewer process
Separate Codex review agent
Fresh clone
Yes
Independent retrieval
Yes
Authoring artifacts used
No
Reviewed head
37161f25cbc76380cce72f57f370275f22f96a77
Reviewed tree
4bcb7f61292eb8d358ea67d63ee9baf598651852
Receipt digest
503d16396b25b1c22d7fc10ac6fb7db2e530e6ce348d63fa8b639db5a5288f0a

What was checked

Bounded scope

  • Exact candidate bytes, dossier identity, and Git binding
  • Primary artifacts, public data workbooks, and exact source spans
  • Lineage topology, count derivation, target baselines, and limitations
  • License treatment, deterministic rebuild, and full repository check

4 candidate files · 29 source receipts · 86 span records

What this does not prove

Limitations

  • This is a bounded lineage case study through the declared cutoff, not a systematic review or effect-size estimate.
  • The unpublished Skurnik, Yoon, and Schwarz 2007 manuscript and participant-data identity remain unavailable; that lineage is explicitly unknown and receives zero evidential credit.
  • Raw automated captures for Schwarz 2016, Carnahan and Garrett 2020, and Rich and Zaragoza 2016 remained unavailable; their quote-minimal exact spans were independently read from authoritative publisher renditions.
  • The Bristol Ecker-Hogan and Edinburgh Pluviano endpoints regenerate raw PDF covers; capture-specific raw digests changed while the declared pdftotext semantic digests and exact spans reproduced.
  • Distinct participant-data roots do not imply independent research programs; shared authors, recruitment frames, methods, ethics series, and materials remain separately disclosed.
  • Restricted works are represented by metadata, digests where available, and quote-minimal attributed excerpts; full provider artifacts are not redistributed.

Build receipt

Reproduce this projection

Reproducible projection
Dossier
em:dossier:sha256:4339d6d6d52b9b534d2e63c95f52ff3cf90be5264f567762f47bab9af4d945a7
Catalog
em:catalog:sha256:9bfc972213cba2cde167386103dc2c011ee74639fb7f0794c54120fbbdef1a5d
Frontier
em:frontier:sha256:f33be3eae4c75232d56750ef9a1aa79d96274ece3417d65a75c1391bf61a81bf
Accepted commit
f92846570180dfa4511263f8ba98ecd18f7772c9
Epistemic policy
commons-balanced-v0.1
Disclosure policy
public-noninterference-v0.1
Compiler
epistemedia/0.2.0
Content digest
76c349f7e9c215d3733fd52922cb903d2bed9d16653aa2bcec016a8b431a993e